论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨并对比分析开腹与腹腔镜修补术治疗消化性溃疡穿孔的临床效果.方法将56例消化性溃疡穿孔患者随机分为两组,每组28例.对照组采用开腹修补术,研究组采用腹腔镜修补术,对比分析两组患者临床情况和效果.结果研究组患者手术中出血量以及术后疼痛评分、排气时间、住院时间等指标均明显比对照组低,且并发症发生率也明显比对照组少,二者差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05).结论在消化性溃疡穿孔的临床治疗中,采用腹腔镜修补术可有效减轻手术创伤,缓解疼痛,便于患者的康复,在临床中具有应用和推广价值. “,”Objective To compare the clinical effect of open and laparoscopic repair in the treatment of peptic ulcer perforation. Methods 56 cases of peptic ulcer perforation were randomly divided into two groups,28 cases in each group. The control group used open neoplasty,research group usedlaparoscopic repair,comparative analysis of two groups of patients with clinical efficacy. Results The study group patients operative bleeding and postoperative pain score,the exhaust time,hospitalization time and other indicators were significantly lower than the control group,and the incidence of complications is significantly less than the control group,the difference between the two significant,with statistical significance,P〈0.05. Conclusion Using laparoscopic repair can effectively reduce operation wound,relieve pain,patients,and has application value and popularization value in clinical practice.