论文部分内容阅读
目的 :在对牙周炎患者进行治疗时分别应用不同的给药方法,分别对各组临床的治疗效果进行观察与对比。方法 :选择在我院诊断为牙周炎的患者共计292例,将患者分为三组,A组92例患者应用甲硝唑进行口服治疗,B组92例患者给予替硝唑进行口服治疗,C组100例患者给予替硝唑药膜进行治疗,对三组患者临床的治疗效果进行观察与对比,治疗时间为30天。结果 :经过治疗,A组患者临床治疗的总有效率仅为77.08%,明显低于B组与C组的91.67%与94.00%(P<0.05)。结论 :在对牙周炎患者进行治疗时选择应用替硝唑作为治疗药物能够获得十分理想的临床应用效果,且以药膜的方式进行治疗更优于以口服的方式进行治疗,值得在临床中推广并应用。
Objective: In the treatment of periodontitis patients were applied different methods of administration, respectively, the clinical treatment of each group were observed and compared. Methods: A total of 292 patients with periodontitis diagnosed in our hospital were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into three groups: 92 patients in group A were treated with metronidazole orally; 92 patients in group B were treated with tinidazole orally; 100 patients in group C were treated with tinidazole film, and the clinical effects were observed and compared in three groups. The treatment time was 30 days. Results: After treatment, the total effective rate of clinical treatment in group A was only 77.08%, which was significantly lower than 91.67% and 94.00% in group B and group C (P <0.05). Conclusion: The application of tinidazole as a therapeutic drug in the treatment of patients with periodontitis can obtain very good clinical application effect, and the treatment by means of membrane is better than the oral treatment, which is worth in the clinical Promote and apply.