论文部分内容阅读
刑事和解与刑事审判程序不同,它更加重视当事人双方自由选择的意愿,不能忽视证明责任和证明标准这两个证据法中的基本问题。在实践占主导地位的司法调解模式下的刑事和解作为审判前程序,由检察机关主持,包含加害方自愿认罪和双方达成赔偿协议两个阶段,蕴含着刑事和民事两种不同的证明对象、证明责任和证明标准。应当参照刑事诉讼和民事诉讼的规则,明确刑事和解程序中的证明责任主体、分配规则以及不同阶段的证明标准,这有利于刑事和解顺利开展,达到案结事了。
Different from criminal procedure, criminal reconciliation attaches more importance to the free choice of both parties, and can not ignore the basic issues in the two evidential laws of burden of proof and standard of proof. Criminal reconciliation in the practice of the dominant mode of judicial mediation as the pre-trial procedure is presided over by the procuratorial organs. It consists of two stages: voluntary confession by injuring party and compensation agreement reached by both parties, which contains two different kinds of criminal and civil testimonials Responsibility and certification standards. Reference should be made to the rules of criminal procedure and civil procedure to clarify the main body of the burden of proof, the rules of distribution and the certification standards at different stages in the criminal reconciliation procedure, which is conducive to the smooth development of criminal reconciliation and to the conclusion of the case.