论文部分内容阅读
80年代以来,尽管还有相当一部分学者坚持郭沫若研究,并取得了一定的成果,但无可讳言,在文史领域,郭沫若研究已经成为相当冷门的专业。在文学史专业中,郭沫若研究不仅不能跟鲁迅研究相比,也无法跟周作人、沈从文研究相比;在史学史和近代思想史研究领域亦如此,与研究章太炎、胡适、陈寅恪等人相比,用“冰火两重天”来形容郭沫若研究一点都不为过。郭沫若研究在近三十年来遭受遇冷的原因,与其说是郭沫若在婚姻生
Since the 1980s, although a considerable number of scholars still insist on Guo Moruo’s research and have achieved some achievements, it is undeniable that in the field of literature and history, Guo Moruo’s study has become quite a popular specialty. In the history of literary history, Guo’s research can not only compare with the study of Lu Xun, but also can not compare with the study of Zhou Zuoren and Shen Congwen; also in the history of history and the study of modern history of thought, compared with the study of Zhang Taiyan, Hu Shi, Chen Yinke and others , Use “ice and fire double days ” to describe Guo Moruo study is not an exaggeration. Guo Moruo studied in the past three decades suffered the reasons for the cold, so much that Guo Moruo in marriage