如果让十位作者写同一桩事件,难免会出现十种样式,读者常能从报道中体验到作者间的这种差异,有时从中给人的是一种充当学生的体验。这不是读者出了什么问题,而是作者摆出了居高临下的架式,字里行间咄咄逼人的气势不用说,对是是非非的褒贬之辞随处可见,做过了火的时候棍子、帽子满天飞。记者们的价值观毫无遮掩地参与到了行文当中,这是差异的滥觞。以往人们把它简单地归结于训练的结果,其实越是写作的高手,他们之间的差异就越大,甚至常常有意地显示出属于个人的作派。一桩事件居然数种报道样式,持肯定意见的理直气壮,持否定意见的据理力争,那么,真实又当如何解释。或者说,那么多种说法,读者应该听谁的? If you let the ten writers write the same incident, there will inevitably be ten styles, the reader can often experience from the reports of this difference between the authors, and sometimes gives people a kind of experience as a student. This is not the reader what went wrong, but the author put on a towering frame, the imposing words in the line of imposing momentum needless to say, right and wrong of the commendable rhetoric can be seen everywhere, when done the fire stick, hat flying. The values ​​of journalists involved in the language without any cover up, which is the origin of the difference. In the past people simply put it at the training results, in fact, the more master of writing, the greater the difference between them, and often often deliberately show the personal belongings. An incident actually several kinds of reporting style, holding a positive opinion of righteousness, negative arguments argued that, then, how to explain the real when. Or, so many kinds of claims, readers should listen to whom?