论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析冠脉介入治疗与抗凝治疗不稳定型心绞痛临床效果观察。方法:本院通过采用随机数字抽签法,选取不稳定型心绞痛患者68例为本研究对象,其中包括34例试验组患者以及34例常规组患者。常规组均给予抗凝治疗,试验组给予冠脉介入治疗。对两组患者的治疗效果进行比较分析。结果:经过不同治疗后,试验组患者均显效,仅1例再发心绞痛;常规组患者治疗总有效率为97.06%(33/34),有5例再发心绞痛和2例左心衰竭。两组间比较傲差异具备统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:针对于不稳定型心绞痛患者而言,在治疗的过程中运用冠脉介入治疗以及抗凝治疗均能够起到良好的治疗效果,但相比于抗凝治疗,冠脉介入治疗更能对患者的心功能起到改善作用,值得推广使用。
Objective: To analyze the clinical effect of coronary intervention and anticoagulation in patients with unstable angina pectoris. Methods: We randomly selected 68 cases of unstable angina pectoris patients by random digital lottery method, including 34 patients in the experimental group and 34 patients in the conventional group. The conventional group were given anticoagulant therapy, the experimental group given coronary intervention. The treatment effect of two groups of patients were compared. Results: After different treatments, the patients in the test group were all markedly effective, with only 1 case of recurrent angina. The total effective rate was 97.06% (33/34) in the conventional group and 5 cases of recurrent angina and 2 cases of left heart failure. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). CONCLUSION: Coronary intervention and anticoagulant therapy in patients with unstable angina pectoris have a good therapeutic effect in patients with unstable angina pectoris, but coronary intervention is more effective than anticoagulant therapy in patients with unstable angina pectoris The patient’s heart function plays a role in improving, it is worth promoting.