论文部分内容阅读
目的观察分析口腔种植修复牙列缺损的临床疗效。方法选择2011年1月至2015年12月我科室收治的212例牙列缺损的患者为本次研究对象,按照治疗方式的不同分成两组,观察组患者采用口腔种植牙修复,对照组采用传统方式修复。统计两组患者的治疗效果并进行对比。结果观察组患者109例,治疗显效90例,占82.57%;有效18例,占16.51%;无效1例,占0.92%;总有效率为99.08%。对照组患者103例,治疗显效60例,占58.25%;有效38例,占36.89%;无效5例,占4.85%;总有效率为95.15%。两组患者的治疗总有效率比较无明显差异,但是观察组患者的治疗显效率明显高于对照组,P<0.05,具有统计学意义。结论牙列缺损修复采用口腔种植修复的效果较好,利于患者的预后,对患者日后的美观度、使用度都较传统的明显提高,值得临床推广。
Objective To observe the clinical effect of dental implants in repairing dentition defect. Methods From January 2011 to December 2015, 212 cases of dentition defects in our department were selected as the study subjects, divided into two groups according to the different treatment methods, and the patients in the observation group were treated with dental implants. The control group was treated with the traditional method Way to repair. Statistics of two groups of patients and compare the effect of treatment. Results The observation group of 109 patients, the treatment was effective in 90 cases, accounting for 82.57%; effective in 18 cases, accounting for 16.51%; ineffective in 1 case, accounting for 0.92%; the total effective rate was 99.08%. The control group of 103 patients, the treatment was effective in 60 cases, accounting for 58.25%; effective in 38 cases, accounting for 36.89%; invalid in 5 cases, accounting for 4.85%; the total effective rate was 95.15%. The total effective rate of the two groups of patients was no significant difference, but the observation group of patients was significantly higher than the effective rate of treatment, P <0.05, with statistical significance. Conclusions Dental prosthesis repair with oral implants is better, which is benefit to the prognosis of patients. It is worthy of clinical promotion to improve the aesthetic and usage of patients in the future.