论文部分内容阅读
王国维与陈寅恪在20世纪文学学术史上,都占有颇为重要的地位。王国维侧重论述小令,并未过多关注结构,但其“隔与不隔”之说,其实更多的是就结构整体而言的;陈寅恪对中国文学的整体结构并不满意,但对名家的短篇诗文的结构却较为推崇。王国维对文体嬗变的规律有比较系统的探讨,并以文体为底蕴提出了“一代有一代之文学”之说;陈寅恪则对若干具体的文体深加研讨,对“破体”现象予以积极评价。王国维的文学研究注重审美感悟,而陈寅恪的诗史互证则强化了考信征实的研究风气。王国维的文学研究模式讲究明其源流,观其会通,而陈寅恪则主张同一题材不同文体之间的比较衡诂,两种模式各有特长并互相补充,共同丰富并推动了20世纪中国文学研究的格局和进程。
Both Wang Guowei and Chen Yinque occupy a quite important position in the academic history of 20th century literature. Wang Guowei focused on Xiaoling, did not pay too much attention to the structure, but its “separation and non-separation” is actually more about the structure as a whole; Chen Yinke is not satisfied with the overall structure of Chinese literature, But the famous short story structure is more respected. Wang Guowei has a systematic discussion on the law of the evolution of stylistic style, and puts forward the theory of “the literature of one generation and one generation” based on the stylistic principles. Chen Yinque further discusses some specific stylistic aspects, Phenomenon to be positive evaluation. Wang Guowei’s literary studies focus on aesthetic perception, while Chen Yinke’s mutual proof of poetry and history strengthens the research ethos of examining the letter. Wang Guowei’s literary research model stresses its origins, the concept of meeting, and Chen Yin Ke advocates the same theme of different styles of balance between the two models have their own strengths and complement each other to jointly enrich and promote the 20th century Chinese literature Research pattern and process.