在《美术课程标准》强调评价的功能中指出“在义务教育阶段的美术教育中,评价主要是为了促进学生发展”。美术作业的评价是课程教学的重要环节,评价的好坏不但直接影响学生对美术学习的兴趣,而且也会对他们的世界观、人生观、健全人格的形成都有着一定的影响。而如今很多教师对美术作品的评价要么标准单一化,受传统的约定俗成的绘画评价标准的影响,对学生美术作业的评价大多还停留在“像”与“不像”“好”与“不好”的阶段,仍然脱离不了现实主义绘画标准的约束;要么都好,一味地以盲目、宽松的鼓励方式评价学生的作业,一个“优”到底,在一定程度上偏离了美术学科评价的目的,严重地挫伤了学生学习美术的积极性。美术作业评价应该是多元、开放的评价标准,与基本作业要求相结合,这样才能 In the art curriculum standard emphasizes the function of evaluation, it points out that “in the art education at the stage of compulsory education, the evaluation is mainly to promote the development of students.” The evaluation of fine arts homework is an important part of the course teaching. The evaluation not only directly affects the students’ interest in fine arts study, but also affects their world outlook, outlook on life and the formation of sound personality. Nowadays many teachers evaluate the works of art either standardize the standard, by the traditional conventions of the evaluation criteria of the impact of painting, mostly for students in the evaluation of fine arts still remain in the “like” and “unlike” “good” “And” “is not good ” stage, still can not be separated from the realism painting standard constraints; Either good, blindly, blindly, relaxed encouragement evaluation student work, a “excellent ” in the end, The degree of deviation from the purpose of art assessment, seriously dampened the enthusiasm of students to learn art. Art homework evaluation should be a multiple, open evaluation standard, combined with the basic operational requirements, so as to