在民事诉讼中,一方当事人不服一审判决而提起上诉,二审法院在审理上诉案件过程中应该对一审裁判进行全面审查还是有限审查的问题,司法解释的规定存在前后规定不一致的地方。这种不一致实际上是制定司法解释的时候国家推行的司法政策不同所导致的。目前,在能动司法视野下,二审法院应当作出与现时的司法政策相呼应的选择,即在二审过程中应当对一审裁判进行全面审查。 In a civil lawsuit, one of the parties disagrees with the judgment of the first instance and lodged an appeal. The court of second instance should conduct a comprehensive review or a limited review of the first instance verdict in the course of hearing the appeal. There are inconsistencies in the provisions of the judicial interpretation before and after the appeal. This kind of inconsistency is actually caused by the different judicial policies promoted by the state when making judicial interpretations. At present, from the perspective of an active judicial system, the court of second instance should make the echoes of the existing judicial policies, that is, a full review of the first instance verdict should be conducted during the second instance.