论文部分内容阅读
(三)刑警业务素质测评指标权重的确定刑警业务素质测评指标体系明确后,不能认为整个刑警业务素质测评体系即告完成。测评指标只是明确了测评指标体系的内容,而民警们注重的是在这些测评指标上的测评结果,因而必须对每个测评指标在予以充分解释的基础上量化记分。测评指标的量化记分基本上取决于测评目的和测评对象,同样的测评指标在不同测评对象的测评中,其解释和量化记分是不一样的。例如“组织能力”这一测评子指标在对非领导职务的刑警和担任领导职务的刑警测评时的要求是不一样的;即便对同一测评对象,如果测评目的不同,对同一测评指标的解释和量化记分也不相同。所以,一般在一
(C) Interpol business quality evaluation index to determine the weight Interpol business quality evaluation index system is clear, we can not think that the entire Interpol business quality evaluation system will be completed. The evaluation index just defines the content of the evaluation index system, and the police pay attention to the evaluation results on these evaluation indexes. Therefore, each evaluation index must be quantified on the basis of sufficient explanation. The quantitative score of evaluation index basically depends on the purpose of evaluation and evaluation object. The same evaluation index is different in the evaluation of different evaluation objects, and the explanation and quantification score are different. For example, the evaluation index of “organizational capacity” is different from the requirements of Interpol in non-leadership positions and Interpol evaluation in leading positions. Even for the same evaluation object, if the purpose of the evaluation is different, the interpretation of the same evaluation index and Quantitative score is not the same. So, usually in one