论文部分内容阅读
后马克思主义文论家弗兰克·莫莱蒂以文体/文类(Genre)为核心建构起来的文学史,当然是以长时段和进化论为基础的。相对前两者,这里的问题更为具体、棘手。它涉及我们书写文学史首先必须要面对的问题。有学者鉴于中国丰富的文体理论资源,也倡议建立有别于一般文学史的文体文学史。例如,吴承学对文体文学史的性质、特征的阐述:“在文学史研究中,文体史是有一定独立性的研究领域。文体史研究在价值取向以及理论、方法等方面,不仅应该有别于哲学、历史学、政治学、社会学等学科,也应该
Post-Marxist literary critic Frank Moretti’s literary / structural genre (Genre) as the core of the construction of the history of literature, of course, is based on long periods and evolutionary theory. Compared with the former two, the problem here is more specific and difficult. It involves the first question we must face when we write the history of literature. Some scholars, in view of China’s abundant stylistic resources, also advocate the establishment of a literary and literary history that is different from the general literary history. For example, Wu Chengxue elaborates the nature and characteristics of literary and literary history: ”In the study of literary history, stylistic history is a field of research that has some independence, and the research on it must not only be different in value orientation, theory, and method In philosophy, history, politics, sociology and other disciplines, it should be