为2004年高考编写或改版的复习资料大多一仍旧贯吸收新的高考题作为“经典例题”。“经典例题”还须配以精当的解析,方能发挥应有的效用。然而笔者发现,2004年高考语文复习资料对2002年(03年的试题多未及收入)全国卷成语题中C、D两项的解析,有的只是摘引一下辞书上的解释,便匆 Most of the review materials written or revised for the 2004 college entrance examination still absorb the new college entrance examination questions as “classical examples”. “Classic examples” must also be complemented with rigorous analysis in order to achieve the desired effect. However, the author finds that in the 2004 college entrance examination review data, the analysis of C, D in the national volume idiom questions in 2002 (the 2003 questions and more untested income), some of them just quote the explanation in the dictionary, they hurried