论文部分内容阅读
尽管各方反复呼吁北约加强常规军备投资,但是收获甚微,大多数北约国家的常规军备投资还不到3%,甚至在面临数量上占极大优势的华约集团,明显需要大力加强军费开支时,情况仍然如此。由于以人对人、以导弹对导弹的方式对抗华约,费用太昂贵,所以美军提出一个替代方法,即制定了2000年空/地作战原则,以此来对抗华约庞大军队,避免因战争升级冒着使用战术核武器的风险。
Despite the repeated calls by all parties to NATO to step up its conventional arms investments, the gains have been very small. Most NATO countries have less than 3% of their conventional armament investments. Even the Huayo Group, which faces a tremendous number advantage, obviously needs to greatly increase military expenditures When the situation is still the case. Since it is too expensive to oppose the Warsaw Pact in a man-to-man or missile-to-missile manner, the U.S. military has proposed an alternative method of setting up the 2000 air / ground warfare principle in order to oppose the large number of Watson troops and to avoid the war caused by the war Upgrade risking the use of tactical nuclear weapons.