论文部分内容阅读
本刊在1986年第2期刊登了《对化学反应中△H~0和△G~0单位的探讨》一文。该文对目前在国内外常见的物理化学及普通化学教材中△H~0和△G~0两个物理量单位的不同进行了讨论,并认为沿用[焦耳]比较合理。这一结论是不妥当的。最近本刊陆续收到几篇讨论这一问题的文章,我们现选登高执棣同志的文章,该文从一些基本概念开始推导出该两个物理量的单位应为[焦耳·摩尔~(-1)],较为令人信服。晚些时候又收到有相似看法的东北林业大学林工系史国瑞和山西大学化学系严成华等人的文章,本刊不再一一刊登。本刊编辑部在此向史国瑞、严成华以及其他来稿或指出这一问题的同志表示衷心的谢意。
This issue in the second issue of 1986 published “on the chemical reaction △ H ~ 0 and △ G ~ 0 units of” article. This paper discusses the differences of △ H ~ 0 and △ G ~ 0 physical units in the common physical chemistry and general chemistry teaching both at home and abroad. It is believed that the use of [Joule] is more reasonable. This conclusion is not appropriate. Recently, we have received several articles discussing this issue in succession. We have now chosen an article to ascend Comrade Qiu Di. From the basic concepts, the article deduces that the units of these two physical quantities should be [Joule-Mole ~ (-1) ], More convincing. Later received a similar view of the Forestry Department of Northeast Forestry University Shui Guorui and Shanxi University Department of Chemistry Yan Chenghua and other articles, this issue will not be published one by one. Our editorial department hereby expresses its sincere gratitude to Shi Guorui, Yan Chenghua and other comrades who have contributed or pointed out this issue.