论文部分内容阅读
近来学习严文明先生关于中国文明起源的论述,特别是2004年和2010年严先生在赤峰红山文化研讨会的两次讲话。在2004年的研讨会上,他对牛河梁遗址诸积石冢进行分析,提出它们在有共同特点的前提下,又在冢体形状、结构和随葬玉器组合、造型上各有不同,说明诸积石冢不可能只是就近的人群到这里埋葬的,一定是很大范围的各个群体向牛河梁地区汇集的结果,所以牛河梁应该就是红山文化的中心~①。2010年又是在赤峰会上,严先生对各地文明起源的特点进行比较,对中国文明起源的多元说和包括西辽河流域红山文化在内的多种文明起源模式作了系统论述~②。受严文明等先生观点的启发,结合我近年对辽河文明起源道路与特点的思考,又不断有一些新的认识。
I have recently studied Mr. Yan Wenming’s discourse on the origins of Chinese civilization, especially his two speeches made by Yan at the Hongshan Cultural Seminar in Chifeng in 2004 and 2010. At the symposium in 2004, he analyzed the gravel mounds of the Niuheliang site and proposed that they all have different shapes and structures and jade juxtapositions under the premise of having common features, indicating that It is impossible for the numerous graves to be buried here, and must be the result of a large-scale gathering of various groups in Niuheliang area. Niuheliang should be the center of Hongshan culture. In 2010, again at the Chifeng Summit, Mr. Yan compared the characteristics of the origins of civilizations in various places and systematically discussed the pluralism of the origins of Chinese civilization and the origins of various civilizations including the Hongshan culture in the West Liaohe River Basin. Inspired by the views of Yan Wenming and other gentlemen, combined with my thinking on the origins and characteristics of the Liaohe civilization in recent years, I have kept some new understandings.