论文部分内容阅读
公民以实施宪法监督权为目的,依照一定的客观根据,合乎逻辑地相信某一事实具有真实性,符合这样的条件,表现自由法益的保护优越于名誉权法益的保护,有关监督权的言论即使未能证明真实性,也应当阻却言论的违法性。一方面保护公民实施宪法监督权时的自由讨论,担心事实的真实性无法证明被追究法律责任,公民的表现自由必然会受到限制;另一方面,以一定客观事实为根据进行合乎逻辑地推断作为限制条件,坚守名誉权保护的刑事法根基。
For the purpose of implementing the power of constitutional supervision, citizens should logically believe that a fact is true and in conformity with such conditions, that the protection of the law of freedom is superior to the protection of the legal rights and interests of the reputation, Failure to prove the authenticity should also stop the illegality of speech. On the one hand, the protection of citizens ’freedom of constitutional supervision is freely discussed. Concerned that the truth of the facts can not be proved to be investigated for legal responsibility, the citizens’ freedom of expression is bound to be limited. On the other hand, the objective reason is used as a basis for reasoning as a restriction Conditions, adhere to the right to protection of criminal law foundation.