批评报道屡吃“官司”的原因，就文章本身的内容看，不外乎两种：客观性的事实失实──或基本失实，或部分失实；主观性的言词失当──或恣意推论，或片面评论。由于事实属实是任何报道都必须无一例外恪守的准则，没有探讨的余地，所以用词规范就成了批评报道必须尽力注意的问? Criticisms of the causes of the frequent use of “lawsuits” are nothing more than two in the context of the article itself: the factual factual objectivity of objectivity - either the basic failure or the partial failure; the subjective misrepresentation - either arbitrarily or One-sided comments. As facts are the criteria that any report must abide by without exception, there is no room for exploration. Therefore, the norms of words have become the question that critics must pay attention to.