论文部分内容阅读
为了弥补法定量刑情节在司法实践中的不足,司法实践活动中规定法官对案件的审判具有酌定量刑权。由于酌定量刑情节缺乏明确的法律规定,在司法实践中没有一个统一、明确的使用标准,主要依赖于法官的自由心证做出裁量。这就意味着在司法实践中对于量刑时对于是否考虑以及考虑范围的大小,几乎是完全取决于法官的法律素质和法律意识。我国法律发展现实状况和我国法官素质参差不齐,酌定量刑造成了司法实践中量刑的失衡、不公正的局面,严重影响了我国司法公正。酌定量刑情节在我国现有刑法理论中也存在较大的争议,有不少学者坚持酌定情节法定化。酌定量刑情节在我国司法实践中同法定量刑情节一样,有着重要的地位。尽管在我国刑法中没有对酌定量刑情节做出明文的规定,但是由于它存在的范围甚至比法定量刑情节还要大,也是司法实践和刑法理论的经验总结,因此,我们必须重视酌定量刑情节的运用,针对常见的酌定量刑情节进行法律规定。
In order to make up for the lack of judicial practice in the legal sentencing circumstances, judicial practice stipulates that judges have discretionary sentencing power for the trial of the case. Due to the lack of clear legal provisions in the discretionary circumstances of sentencing, there is no uniform and definite standard of use in judicial practice, which relies mainly on the discretion of the judge on free proof. This means that in judicatory practice for sentencing whether to consider and consider the scope of the size, almost entirely depends on the legal quality of judges and legal awareness. The actual situation of legal development in our country and the uneven quality of judges in our country lead to the imbalance and injustice of sentencing in judicial practice due to discretionary sentencing, which has seriously affected the judicial fairness in our country. Discretionary sentencing circumstances exist in our country’s existing criminal law theory there is a big controversy, many scholars insist on legal circumstances discretion. The discretionary circumstances of sentencing has the same status as the legal sentencing circumstances in our judicial practice. Although there is no explicit stipulation in our criminal law about discretionary sentencing circumstances, its scope is even larger than the statutory sentencing circumstances. It is also the experience summary of judicial practice and criminal law theory. Therefore, we must attach importance to discretionary sentencing circumstances The legal provisions for the common discretionary sentencing circumstances.