论文部分内容阅读
目的比较宫颈环切与微波治疗慢性宫颈炎的临床效果。方法慢性宫颈炎患者80例,按照随机数字法分为观察组和对照组,各40例。观察组使用宫颈环切,对照组进行微波治疗,比较两组手术时间、术中出血量及术后疼痛视觉模拟评分,并统计两组临床疗效。结果观察组手术时间短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组,术后疼痛视觉模拟评分低于对照组,观察组治疗效果优于对照组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论宫颈环切治疗慢性宫颈炎,尤其是合并有宫颈息肉甚至宫颈腺囊肿患者,其术中出血少,术后恢复快,手术效果确切,值得临床推广。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of cervical circumcision and microwave treatment of chronic cervicitis. Methods Eighty patients with chronic cervicitis were divided into observation group and control group according to random number method, 40 cases each. The observation group was treated with cervical circumcision and the control group with microwave treatment. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative pain visual analogue scale were compared between the two groups. The clinical curative effect was also calculated. Results The operation time in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group. The blood loss in the observation group was less than that in the control group. The postoperative pain visual analogue scale was lower than that in the control group. The observation group had better curative effect than the control group (P <0.05) . Conclusion Cervical circumcision for the treatment of chronic cervicitis, especially with cervical polyps and cervical adenocarcinoma in patients with less bleeding during surgery, postoperative recovery quickly, the exact effect of surgery, is worth clinical promotion.