目前到企业调研,经营者对我诉说苦恼:该企业效益平平,近年一直过着“吊氧气”的日子。为了寻找出路,他们准备加大改制力度。于是,派出了四个小组分别向同行中的改革先行者、佼佼者问计。结果,四组都根据同行经验,分别提出了置换产权、股份合作制、兼并破产、国有民营四种改革模式。四种改革形式各有千秋,竟让经营者不知如何是好。选来选去,比上比下,还是拿不定主意,干脆来个暂时不改。结果,企业绩效如故。听其苦恼,让我想起了“布里丹效应”。西方的布里丹曾以寓言中饿死在草堆里的驴子为例,形象地描述了当断不断必受其乱的道理 At present, the company surveyed and the operators complained to me that the company’s profits were flat and it’s been days of “hanging oxygen” in recent years. In order to find a way out, they are ready to increase their efforts to reform. Thus, four teams were sent to each of the reform pioneers and leaders in the industry. As a result, according to peer experience, the four groups respectively proposed four reform modes: replacement of property rights, joint-stock cooperative system, merger and bankruptcy, and state-owned private ownership. The four forms of reform have their merits and demerits, so that managers do not know what to do. If you choose to go for election, you will still have to change your mind. As a result, corporate performance is as it was. Listening to his distress reminds me of the Britan effect. In the case of Brittany in the West, taking the fabled ass in his haystack as an example, he vividly described the truth that when it was broken, it must continue to be confused.