从后殖民主义文学批评的角度看二十世纪英国著名作家E.M.福斯特的小说《印度之行》,小说中的人物戈德波尔虽然从某种角度认可了印度教存在的合理性,但小说对印度教徒戈德波尔及其所代表的宗教的描写并没能超越西方集体的殖民话语和东方主义思想,作者思想的矛盾性与难以摆脱的殖民话语使得小说中东西方沟通的结局注定是分离而非联结。 From the perspective of post-colonialism literary criticism, the famous novelist EM Forster’s novel “Travel in India” of the 20th century, while the novel’s character Goldpoole recognized the rationality of Hinduism in some ways, The description of Hindu Godbold and the religion represented by it does not surpass the collective colonial discourse and Orientalism in the West. The contradiction between the author’s ideas and the colonial discourse that makes it difficult to get rid of the fate of East-West communication in the novel is doomed to be Separated but not linked.