在《存在与时间》中,海德格尔对于康德的最主要指责是:耽搁了一件本质性的大事,即此在存在论。1但是《存在与时间》没有对此进行详细的探讨。而在随后的《现象学之基本问题》、《康德与形而上学疑难》(下面简称为《康德书》)等作品中,海德格尔以其自身的方式对康德进行了阐释。海德格尔的基本意图是要将康德的《纯粹理性批判》阐释为基础存在论或此在存在论。 In “Being and Time,” Heidegger’s primary accusation of Kant is the delay of an essential event, that is, ontology. 1 However, “Being and Time” did not discuss this in detail. Heidegger explained Kant in his own way in the following works such as “The Basic Problems of Phenomenology” and “Kant and Metaphysical Problems” (hereinafter referred to as “Kant’s Book”). Heidegger’s basic intention is to interpret Kant’s “critique of pure rationality” as the basis for existence or ontology.