论文部分内容阅读
近年来已有不少同志提出了理论与政策研究的相对独立性,并进行了必要的探索,与此同时,城市规划改革的必要性也提出来了。但令人感到遗憾的是,这一切多半都还止于日常工作的层次上——诸如对某一城市,或技术某一方面改进的设计与步骤——,而真正把城市规划当作为一门理论科学来加以论述的文章还很少看到。随着这一领域内研究工作的深入展开,方法问题必然提到工程上来。本文作者——英国的帕齐·希莉先生回顾了自50年代以来西方的有关辩论,对西方(尤其是英国)的城市规划方法作了深入浅出的介绍,并阐述了近年来兴起的一种政治经济学方法。想必关注国外研究动态的读者会从中获得有益的启示。
In recent years, many comrades have put forward the relative independence of theoretical and policy research and conducted necessary exploration. At the same time, the necessity of urban planning reform has also been put forward. However, it is regrettable that most of this is still at the level of daily work - such as improving the design and steps of a city or a certain area of technology - and truly treating urban planning as a Articles from theoretical science are rarely seen. With the deepening of research work in this area, the methodological problems inevitably refer to engineering. The author of this article, Mr. Paz Shirley of the UK, reviewed the relevant Western debates since the 1950s and introduced the methods of urban planning in the West (especially the United Kingdom) in brief terms, and elaborated on the political reforms that have emerged in recent years Economic method. Readers who are sure to pay attention to the developments of foreign research will benefit from it.