论文部分内容阅读
从《广右战功录》和《明史·沈希仪传》的主观存世目的、叙事线索以及部分文字描写诸方面看,后者确实采用了前者。但对两书的文学特点的密和精、行文中记述事件发生时间的模糊和精确以及两文断限的不同诸方面的考察,《广右战功录》亦不是《明史·沈希仪传》唯一材料来源,唐顺之《都督沈紫江生墓碑》也是其重要来源之一。而《广右战功录》也有独立于《明史·沈希仪传》之外的学术价值,这主要表现在学以经世的价值取向、于明代皇朝史上的地位和于唐顺之学术演变上的意义三个方面。
From the perspectives of the objective existence, the narrative clues and the description of some of the characters in Guang Quan Gong Ji Lu and Ming Xi Shen Xi Yi Zhuan, the latter actually adopted the former. However, both the literary features of the two books are closely related to each other and the text describes the time of the incident as ambiguous and precise as well as the different aspects of the two languages. Source, Tang Shunzhi “Duzheng Shen Zijiang Tombstone” is also one of its important sources. There are also academic values of Guang Quan Gong Gong Lu, which are independent from the biography of Ming Shi Shen Xi, mainly manifested in three aspects: learning from the value orientation of the world through the world, the status in Ming dynasty history and the significance of Tang Shunzhi’s academic evolution .