《分享艰难》一直以来被当作“现实主义冲击波”的典型文本而被广泛误读,其自然主义的叙事策略则被人为忽视。进城后的刘醒龙,以其回看乡土中国的独特视点,有意设置“迷你王八”作为故事叙事的中心线索,真实还原了人因受动物本能、生存环境和文化遗传等多重因素的影响制约而丧失自由意志、迷失自我的荒诞图景,小说重提国民性改造的迫切话题,热切呼应关注“三农”问题的世纪呐喊,自有其现实意义和文学史价值。但“个人”为“集体”分享艰难的现象级的争议话题,导致批评家们对文本的阐释陷入危机。因此,准确厘清《分享艰难》的叙事策略,初步反思脱离文本的批评症候,对于日渐浮躁的学界文坛,重要性不言而喻。 “Difficulty in Sharing” has been widely misread as a typical text of “Realism Shockwave”, and its naturalistic narrative strategy has been neglected. Liu Xinglong, who came into the city after his return to the unique viewpoint of native China, intends to set “Mini Wang Ba” as the central clue of story narration and truly restores the influence of multiple factors such as animal instinct, living environment and cultural heritage Restricting the absurd picture of the free will and loss of oneself. The novel raises an urgent topic of reformation of national character. Eagerly arousing the attention of the “Three Issues of Agriculture, Rural Areas and Peasants” century scandal has its own practical significance and the value of literary history. But “personal” shares the difficult, phenomenal issue of controversy for “collectives,” leading critics to interpret the text as a crisis. Therefore, to accurately clarify the narrative strategy of “sharing hardships” and to initially reflect on the critical symptoms of disconnection from the text, it is self-evident for the increasingly impetuous academic literary world.