论文部分内容阅读
对于因错误裁决而遭受巨大风险损失的当事人而言,一裁终局并非国际商事仲裁的优点。他们通常会寻求国内法院的司法救济,因此上诉机制的缺失并不能保证国际商事仲裁的终局性和效率。现行司法救济程序不但难以有效纠正错误裁决,反而会严重破坏国际商事仲裁的种种优点。建立选择性仲裁内部上诉程序在一定程度上既有助于提高国际商事仲裁的效率又能保证裁决更加公正。
In the case of a party who suffers a significant risk of loss as a result of a wrong decision, the conclusion of a single issue is not a merit of international commercial arbitration. They usually seek judicial remedies in domestic courts, so the absence of an appeal mechanism does not guarantee the finality and efficiency of international commercial arbitration. The current judicial remedy procedure can not only effectively correct the wrong verdict, but will seriously undermine the merits of international commercial arbitration. The establishment of selective appeals for internal appeals process to a certain extent, both to help improve the efficiency of international commercial arbitration and to ensure that rulings more fair.