论文部分内容阅读
编者按:我刊开设“本土化与中国学术转型”专栏快一年时间了。一年来,在学术界同仁的大力支持和积极参与下,我们约请学界各学科领域的著名专家学者就文学、历史学、哲学、社会学、政治学等研究领域的“本土化与中国学术转型”所面临的诸问题展开深入讨论,在学术界产生了较大反响。欣逢中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会胜利召开之际,我们采访同为著名经济学家的复旦大学经济学教授、复旦大学经济思想与经济史研究所所长韦森先生和复旦大学经济学教授、复旦大学新政治经济学研究中心主任史正富先生,针对“当代中国经济学研究的现状、问题与突破方向”诸问题,请他们谈谈自己的看法,借以为中国当代经济学研究号脉施针,去弊兴利。我们呼吁更多
Editor’s Note: I published a “localization and Chinese academic transformation” column almost a year’s time. Over the past year, with the strong support and active participation of colleagues from academia, we have invited renowned experts and scholars from all disciplines in the academic field to study on the localization of “localization” and Chinese academic transformation in such fields as literature, history, philosophy, sociology and political science “Face the problems in-depth discussion, has had a greater response in academia. On the occasion of the victory of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, we interviewed Mr. Wesson, a professor of economics at Fudan University who is also a famous economist, and Dean of the Institute of Economic Thought and Economic History at Fudan University, Professor Shi Zhengfu, director of New Political Economics Research Center of Fudan University, aiming at the problems of ”the status quo, problems and breakthroughs in the study of contemporary Chinese economics," asking them to talk about their own views and to study the contemporary Chinese economics Number pulse Shih-pin, to eliminate the pros and cons. We call for more