论文部分内容阅读
价格卡特尔不仅仅对其直接购买者造成损害,而且还会通过“伞形效应”使同一市场中的其他竞争者的产品价格提高,使得他们的购买者也遭受损失。非卡特尔购买者是否可以就该损失向卡特尔成员提起损害赔偿请求。欧洲法院在2014年的案件中首次对此类受害人的损害赔偿诉讼资格作出了肯定的回答,而我国对该问题的研究还是空白。我国对于垄断纠纷民事诉讼的原告资格及损害赔偿责任也没有特殊的规定。“伞形效应”理论是经济学理论在法学领域中的引入,欧洲法院的司法实践对该理论予以了确认,对探讨“伞形效应”在我国反垄断法的私人执行具有重要借鉴作用。在我国垄断民事诉讼司法实践中,有必要确认“伞形效应”影响下的企业和个人的损害赔偿请求权,并加强经济分析在损害因果关系论证中的作用。
The price cartel not only harms its direct buyers, but also raises the prices of other competitors in the same market through “umbrella effects,” causing their buyers to suffer as well. Whether a non-cartel buyer can file a claim for damages with the cartel member for the loss. The European Court of Justice, for the first time in 2014, answered affirmatively for the suitability of such a victim for damages, and my research on the issue is still blank. There is no special regulation on the plaintiff’s qualification and the liability for damages in China’s civil litigation concerning monopoly disputes. “Umbrella effect ” theory is the introduction of economic theory in the field of law, the judicial practice of the European Court of Justice to confirm the theory, to explore “umbrella effect ” in China’s private enforcement of anti-monopoly law is important Learn from. In our monopoly civil litigation practice, it is necessary to confirm the right of enterprise and individual under the influence of “umbrella effect” and strengthen the role of economic analysis in the causation of causation.