论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨肾病患者血清免疫球蛋白及补体检测的意义。方法:收集2013年4月-2015年1月我院诊断为肾病的患者,疾病类型为急性肾炎、慢性肾炎、肾病综合症等。选择同期我院健康体检患者作为对照组。对比急性肾炎、慢性肾炎、肾病综合症及对照组IgA、IgM、IgG及补体C3、补体C4水平。结果:4组间IgA水平最高为对照组,最低为肾病综合症组,各组间结果比较有差异(P<0.05);4组间IgA水平最高为急性肾炎组,最低为肾病综合症组,各组间结果比较有差异(P<0.05);对照组、慢性肾炎组、肾病综合症组之间IgG水平均低于急性肾炎组,结果比较有差异(P<0.05)。结论:本次研究认为急性肾炎、慢性肾炎、肾病综合症及对照组之间的IgA、IgM、IgG、C3、C4水平存在明显差异,对临床的治疗有一定参考意义。
Objective: To investigate the significance of serum immunoglobulin and complement detection in patients with nephropathy. Methods: The patients diagnosed as nephropathy in our hospital from April 2013 to January 2015 were collected. The types of diseases were acute nephritis, chronic nephritis and nephrotic syndrome. Select the same period in our hospital as a control group. Compare acute nephritis, chronic nephritis, nephrotic syndrome and control group IgA, IgM, IgG and complement C3, complement C4 levels. Results: The highest level of IgA in the four groups was the control group, the lowest one was in the nephrotic syndrome group, with the difference between the groups (P <0.05). The highest level of IgA in the four groups was acute nephritis group, the lowest was in the nephrotic syndrome group, There was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). The IgG levels in control group, chronic nephritis group and nephrotic syndrome group were lower than those in acute nephritic group (P <0.05). Conclusion: This study suggests that acute nephritis, chronic nephritis, nephrotic syndrome and control group between the IgA, IgM, IgG, C3, C4 levels there is a significant difference in the clinical treatment of some reference.