论文部分内容阅读
中国风水在哲学和科学上均大异于西方，“五四”后却被判为“迷信”。改革开放后，天津大学建筑学教授王其亨先生率先再审风水，认为风水虽杂有迷信成分，但它实际是中国古代地理学、气象学、生态学、景观学、规划学、建筑学等自然科学群集，应加以批判继承，引起“风水热”，也激起反弹。在此后国内学界关于风水“含科学说”和风水“迷信说”的争论中，虽然风水“意匠说”和“美学说”获某种共识，但风水“含科学说”至今面对严重挑战。目前，作为风水“孪生学术”的中医“含科学说”越来越获公认，国内风水研究亟待“突围”。由于吴良镛等人认同王其亨思路，目前这种突破正在实施。“,”The Chinese Feng Shui in philosophy and science has great different to that of the west , but since the May 4th Movement, it has been judged as “superstition.” After the reform and open-up, the Architecture Pro-fessor Wang Qiheng with Tianjin University first reexamined Feng Shui, he believes though there is a superstition ingredient in Feng Shui, it actually is the ancient Chinese cluster of geography , meteorology, ecology, landscape, planning , architecture , and other natural science , and it should be critically inherited .This has made Feng Shui a hot issue .Later, the hot debate in the domestic academic circles about “science-included theory” and “supersti-tion theory” has won some consensus for both the “artistic conception” and“aesthetic” of Feng Shui, but today the“science-included theory” still faces serious challenges .At present , the“science-included theory” of the tradition-al Chinese medicine , as the twin brother of Feng Shui, has got much recognition , so the domestic research of Feng Shui needs a urgent break-through .Because Wu Liangyong and others agree with Wang Qiheng ideas , such a breakthrough is being implemented .