论文部分内容阅读
目的:了解南京市市属医院候诊室空气质量状况,为加强医院候诊室监督管理提供依据,为就诊者创造良好的侯诊环境。方法:按照《公共场所卫生监测技术规范》(GB/T17220-1998)的方法进行采样监测。根据《公共场所卫生标准检验方法》(GB/T18204.1～18204.30-2000)和《公共场所空气中可吸入颗粒物(PM10)测定方法光散射法》(WS/T206-2001)进行检测。依据《旅店业卫生标准》(GB9663-1996)进行评价,对监测资料进行分析统计。结果:温度、风速、一氧化碳、甲醛为全部合格的项目;二氧化碳合格率为98.8%;噪声的合格率为81.4%;照度的合格率为98.5%;空气细菌数合格率97.0%,可吸入颗粒物合格率为98.5%。在所监测的21家医院中,各项指标全部合格的有9家,占42.8%;1项指标不合格的为5家,占23.8%;2项指标不合格的为6家,占28.6%;3项指标不合格的为1家,占4.8%。结论:南京市市属二级以上医院候诊室空气质量总体情况较好,但部分监测指标仍存在不同程度的超标情况,应加强监督管理和日常监测。
OBJECTIVE: To understand the air quality status of waiting room in Nanjing Municipal Hospital, to provide basis for strengthening the supervision and management of waiting room in hospital and to create a favorable environment for clinicians. Methods: In accordance with the “public places health monitoring technical specifications” (GB / T17220-1998) method for sampling and monitoring. The test was conducted according to the “Public health standard test methods” (GB / T18204.1 ~ 18204.30-2000) and the “Light scattering method for the determination of respirable particulate matter in public places (PM10)” (WS / T206-2001). According to “hotel industry health standards” (GB9663-1996) for evaluation, monitoring data analysis and statistics. Results: Temperature, wind speed, carbon monoxide and formaldehyde were all qualified items; the passing rate of carbon dioxide was 98.8%; the passing rate of noise was 81.4%; the pass rate of illuminance was 98.5%; the pass rate of air bacteria was 97.0% The rate is 98.5%. Among the 21 hospitals monitored, 9 of them were all qualified, accounting for 42.8%; 5 were unqualified for one indicator, accounting for 23.8%; 6 were unqualified for 2 indicators, accounting for 28.6% ; One of three indicators failed, accounting for 4.8%. Conclusion: The overall air quality of the waiting rooms of hospitals above Grade II in Nanjing is good, but some of the monitoring indicators still have over-standard in varying degrees. Supervision, supervision and routine monitoring should be strengthened.