论文部分内容阅读
1994年,美国商务部的一份有关中国大蒜倾销的调查问卷摆在了中国42家企业的案头,中国企业迟疑了,这一迟疑导致商务部最终裁决给予所有中国大蒜376％的倾销幅度。因为按照美国反倾销法,如果中国出口商品拒绝应诉,不按调查问卷的要求提供资料,则美国商务部只能采用“最佳可获得信息”。多数情况下,这意味着使用美国起诉方提供的信息。此案的结果对于中国大蒜业是灾难性的:中国的大蒜从1994年起被全部赶出美国市场。更为严重的是,这种拒绝应诉的行为助长了美国国内的贸易保护主义,是一种不战而降的
In 1994, a U.S. Department of Commerce questionnaire on the dumping of garlic in China placed the case on 42 Chinese enterprises. Chinese enterprises hesitated. This hesitation caused the Ministry of Commerce to finally award a 376% dumping margin for all Chinese garlic. Because under the United States anti-dumping law, if China's exports refused to respond to the questionnaire, the information requested, the United States Department of Commerce can only use the “best available information.” In most cases, this means using the information provided by the U.S. prosecution. The result of the case is disastrous for the Chinese garlic industry: China's garlic has all been driven out of the U.S. market since 1994. What is even more serious is that this act of refusing to respond to litigation fosters protectionism in the United States. It is a policy of fighting without any decline