论文部分内容阅读
法律史学家们普遍认为东方人具有“厌讼”的传统心理 ,并以为现今东方国家 (中国、日本等 )表现出的低诉讼率应主要归结于此。本文指出 ,对诉讼这一复杂社会现象的研究应兼顾文化和制度结构两个方面 ,造成东方国家低诉讼率的主要原因不在于东方人的“厌讼” ,而在于制度、社会机制的障碍 ,如诉讼在整个社会解决纠纷的机制中所处的地位不高 ,法官、律师人数不足造成的诉讼迟延、公众难以形成诉讼动机等 ;诉论率是一个中立的指标 ,不应作为公众法意识、权利意识现代化的标尺 ;等等。
Legal historians generally believe that Asians have a traditional attitude of “dislike litigation” and attribute mainly to the low rate of litigation they present for the present-day East countries (China, Japan, etc.). This paper points out that the study of the complex social phenomenon of litigation should take into account both the cultural and institutional structures. The main reason for the low litigation rate in the East is not the “lawsuit” of the Orientals but the obstacles of the system and social mechanism, Such as litigation in the entire society to resolve the dispute in the position of the mechanism is not high, judges, lawyers delayed the litigation caused by the lawsuit, the public is difficult to form a motive for litigation; litigation rate is a neutral indicator, not as a public awareness, The modern scale of rights awareness; and so on.