论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨汉、维、哈族中学生自尊与应付方式的关系。方法对146名汉族、115名少数民族中学生进行自尊(SES)及简易应对方式问卷(SCSQ)测试。结果1中学生自尊水平的民族差异不显著(F=1.104,P>0.05);家庭经济自评主效应显著(F=4.498,P<0.01);父亲文化程度主效应显著(F=3.310,P<0.05)。2积极应付方式的民族差异不显著(F=2.170,P>0.05),而消极应付方式的民族差异显著(F=4.608,P<0.01);消极应付方式的父亲职业差异显著(F=3.335,P<0.01)。3消极应付方式与自尊呈负相关(B=-0.081),但只能解释自尊变异的1.9%。结论自尊的民族差异不显著;消极应付方式的民族差异显著;消极应付方式与自尊成显著的负相关。
Objective To explore the relationship between self-esteem and coping styles among Han, Uygur and Kazak middle school students. Methods A total of 146 Han and 115 minority middle school students were tested for self-esteem (SES) and simple coping style (SCSQ). There was no significant difference in the self-esteem level of middle school students (F = 1.104, P> 0.05). The main effect of family economic self-evaluation was significant (F = 4.498, P <0.01) 0.05). (F = 2.170, P> 0.05), while there was significant difference between the negative coping styles (F = 4.608, P <0.01); negative coping style had significant differences in father’s occupational differences (F = 3.335, P <0.01). 3 Negative coping style is negatively correlated with self-esteem (B = -0.081), but only 1.9% of self-esteem variation can be explained. Conclusion Ethnic differences in self-esteem are not significant. Ethnic differences in negative coping styles are significant. Negative coping styles and self-esteem are significantly negatively correlated.