论文部分内容阅读
从个案而言,在边境措施方面来看“中美影响知识产权保护与执法措施案”的专家组裁决对我国的经济性、制度性影响甚微。但是将其置于高标准的知识产权边境保护制度日趋形成的国际趋势中来看,该案是对我国做好充分应对知识产权边境保护国际争端的一个提醒。因此,在2008年《国家知识产权战略纲要》的指导下,我国需要从国际、区域、双边类条约及国际软法类四个方面对边境保护制度全球化进行全面考量,从国际和国内两个实施层面来进行具体的战略实施部署。通过这些措施,一方面可以提升我国对知识产权边境保护制度的创造、运用、实施和管理的能力;另一方面也可以充分发挥我国海关在国际、国内知识产权保护事务中的影响力。
Judging from the individual case, the expert panel judgment on the “Sino-US case of measures for the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights” in terms of border measures has little impact on our economy and system. However, placing it in the international trend of a high standard of border protection for intellectual property rights is a reminder of our country's efforts to fully respond to the international disputes concerning the protection of frontiers of intellectual property. Therefore, under the guidance of the “Outline of National Intellectual Property Strategy” in 2008, our country needs to make a comprehensive consideration of the globalization of the border protection system from four aspects: international, regional and bilateral treaties and international soft law. From both the international and the domestic Implementation level to carry out specific strategic implementation and deployment. Through these measures, on the one hand, China's ability to create, use, implement and manage intellectual property border protection systems can be enhanced; on the other hand, it can also give full play to China's customs influence in international and domestic intellectual property protection matters.