论文部分内容阅读
2016年最高检通过《人民检察院办理羁押必要性审查案件规定(试行)》,从立案、审案、结案三方面着手,更为详尽地规定了羁押必要性审查制度的内容。羁押必要性审查制度维护了刑事诉讼活动的合法公正,保障了在押人员的权利,节约了司法成本,有着显著的制度优势。文章从启动、认知、执行等方面刍议羁押必要性审查制度的不足,并对该制度的完善提出了几点建议。
In 2016, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate passed the Provisions on the Necessity Examination of Detaining Cases Held by the People’s Procuratorate (Trial Implementation), setting forth the contents of the system of censorship of detention in more detail from the following aspects: filing cases, examining cases and closing cases. The system of reviewing the necessity of detention maintains the lawfulness and fairness of criminal procedure activities, guarantees the rights of detainees and saves judicial costs, and has obvious institutional advantages. The essay discusses the insufficiency of censoring the necessity of detention from the aspects of starting, cognition and execution, and puts forward some suggestions on perfecting the system.