论文部分内容阅读
作者运用比较的方法,对近代法上担保物权的基本种类(抵押权、质权、留置权、优先权等)进行了系统分析,认为我国现行担保物权制度颇不完善,须在将来修订民法通则或制定民法典时,予以健全.在担保物权基本种类的选择上,既要借鉴外来有益作法,也要从实际出发,考虑传统和国情.结论是:我国担保物权的基本种类应当是抵押权、质权、留置权以及兼有用益物权属性的典权,优先权不应列为担保物权,有关内容可由单行法和程序法定之.
By comparison, the author systematically analyzes the basic types of security interests (mortgage, pledge, lien, priority, etc.) in modern law, and thinks that the system of current security interest in our country is rather imperfect and needs to be revised in the future Civil law, or the development of civil code, be sound.In the choice of the basic types of security interests, it is necessary to learn from outside good practices, but also from the reality, considering the traditional and national conditions.The conclusion is: the basic types of security interests should be Is the right of mortgage, pledge, lien and equity with the usufruct of rights, the priority should not be listed as a security interest, the relevant content by the law and procedures of the single law.