论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察重症连枷胸手术与非手术治疗的临床疗效对比情况。方法:于本院2006年8月-2016年8月收治的重症连枷胸中,随机选取47例作为样本,将其分为手术组与对照组。对照组采用常规非手术方法治疗,手术组采用急诊手术方法治疗。结果 :手术组患者住院时间(17.98±2.15)d、并发症发生几率3.33%、治疗后4m,患者FVC(3.66±0.89)、FEV1(2.68±1.00)、MMEF(2.25±0.17),与对照组相比,优势显著。结论:应采用手术方法治疗重症连枷胸,缩短患者住院时间,降低并发症发生几率,促使患者肺功能有效恢复。
Objective: To observe the clinical effect of severe flail chest surgery and non-surgical treatment. Methods: In our hospital from August 2006 to August 2016 admitted to the severe flail chest, 47 cases were randomly selected as a sample, divided into surgical group and control group. The control group was treated by conventional non-surgical method, while the surgical group was treated by emergency surgery. Results: The length of hospital stay was (17.98 ± 2.15) days in patients in operation group, and the incidence of complications was 3.33%. After 4 months of treatment, the FVC (3.66 ± 0.89), FEV1 (2.68 ± 1.00), MMEF (2.25 ± 0.17) Compared with the obvious advantages. Conclusion: Surgical treatment of severe flail chest should be used to shorten the hospitalization time, reduce the incidence of complications and promote the recovery of lung function.