论文部分内容阅读
关于新旧事物的标准,现行高中《思想政治》教材写得明明白白:“我们判断一个事物是新还是旧,就要看其是否符合客观规律,有没有强大的生命力和远大的发展前途。”按照这个标准,教材判断说:“所谓新事物,是指符合客观规律,具有强大的生命力和远大的发展前途的东西,相反,那些同客观规律背道而驰,正在日趋灭亡的东西,则是旧事物。”(高二《思想政治》上册,2003年第2版,第65页)应该说,教材所持的这一观点为绝大多数哲学普及读物所认可,但实际上它并不科学,在实际工作中,用这个标准几乎根本无法区别新旧事物,尤其是客观世界的新旧事物。原因有三:
Regarding the standards of old and new things, the current high school “ideological and political” textbooks are clearly written: “We judge whether a thing is new or old, depends on whether it meets the objective laws, whether it has strong vitality and a promising future for development.” “According to this standard, the teaching materials determine: ”The so-called new things refer to things that conform to objective laws and have strong vitality and great development prospects. On the contrary, those things that run counter to objective laws and are dying are old things. “Things” (“College of Ideology and Politics,” Vol.2, 2003, 2nd ed., p. 65) It should be said that this view of teaching materials is recognized by most philosophical popular books, but it is actually not scientific. In practical work, using this standard can hardly distinguish between new and old things, especially the old and new things in the objective world. There are three reasons: