论文部分内容阅读
目的:考察以CCMD-3人格障碍诊断标准编制的筛查问卷(PDQC-3)中C群人格障碍项目的评估效力,为筛查问卷的进一步修改和精简提供依据。方法:用PDQC-3对1248名大学生施测,应用项目反应理论及其方法,针对C群人格障碍项目集中进行分型项目功能分析和维度项目功能分析。结果:依赖型人格障碍所含11个项目中6个项目评估效力较佳、2个项目中等、3个项目较差;负性体验/依赖维度所含15个项目中5个项目评估效力较佳、8个项目中等、2个项目较差。结论:依赖型人格障碍所含项目作为一个整体可对中等依赖水平的被试提供较为精确的评估,在低水平和高水平依赖特质范围内表现得不够精确;而负性体验/依赖维度所含项目作为一个整体对于中高负性体验/依赖特质水平的被试均能提供较为精确的评估;维度评估能为人格障碍的筛查提供更为丰富的信息。
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the C-group personality disorder in the screening questionnaire (PDQC-3) based on the diagnostic criteria for personality disorder (CCMD-3) to provide evidence for the further modification and simplification of the screening questionnaire. Methods: A total of 1248 undergraduates were enrolled in PDQC-3. The project response theory and its methods were used to analyze the function of the sub-type project and the dimension project in the C group. Results: Of the 11 items included in dependent personality disorder, 6 items had better evaluation effect, 2 items were moderate and 3 items were worse. Among 15 items contained in negative experience / dependence dimension, 5 items had better evaluation effect 8 projects are medium and 2 projects are poor. CONCLUSIONS: Dependent personality disorder as a whole can provide a more accurate assessment of subjects with moderate dependence, less accurate than those with low and high levels of dependence, and negative experiences / dependent dimensions As a whole, the project can provide a more accurate assessment of the level of experience / dependence of high and negative negative; dimension assessment can provide more information for the screening of personality disorders.